There is discussion over which of the two glucosamine salts, hydrochloride or sulfate, is preferred for the treatment of osteoarthritis. The answer is straightforward - both salts, in the pure form, deliver equally effective amounts of the desired glucosamine to joint cartilage. If there is a preference, it should be based on relative purity and economics.

Historically, the sulfate was used for the initial European clinical studies because it was made available for that purpose by an Italian pharmaceutical company which had a proprietary position on the sulfate. Thus, it was to their marketing advantage to supply only the sulfate and ignore the hydrochloride.

The original researchers, however, clearly relate all of the observed benefits relative to osteoarthritis to "glucosamine" not to the sulfate. When ingested, glucosamine sulfate is fully ionized in the stomach by the relatively strong concentration of hydrochloric acid (pH 1 - 3) naturally present. As a result, glucosamine ions and sulfate ions are thoroughly mixed with an overwhelming number of chloride and hydrogen ions from the hydrochloric acid. If you could stop at this point and recover the glucosamine salt, you would get 99+% glucosamine hydrochloride as the sulfate is essentially lost due to its very low concentration relative to the extremely large amount of hydrochloric acid present.

As reported by Setnikar1, 54% of the glucosamine that moves into the small intestine (pH 6.8) exists in its un-ionized, amine form (not a salt at all) while 46% is ionized (the amine group is protenated and positively charged). In the blood at pH 7.4, 75% of the glucosamine is present as the neutral amine while only 25% is ionized. Since ionization or high polarity is usually an obstacle in the crossing of cellular membranes, the ability of glucosamine to exist predominantly in its less polar, un-ionized form in the small intestine and, even more so, in the blood contributes directly to its bioavailability. The specific salt form is relevant only as a convenient delivery vehicle with the proviso that the salt must readily dissolve (ionize) in stomach acid when ingested - the hydrochloride and the sulfate equally meet this requirement.

The real issue, therefore, becomes one of purity (and stability). Our highly stable D-Glucosamine Hydrochloride is domestically manufactured in an FDA approved, GMP plant and is 99+ percent pure with less than 0.1% ash on ignition. On the other hand, pure Glucosamine Sulfate is very hygroscopic and degrades rapidly (goes from white to off-white to tan to brown) when exposed to moisture. To avoid this problem, Glucosamine sulfate, as currently imported, is made from glucosamine HCl by adding either sodium or potassium sulfate and co-crystallizing the resulting mixture. For this reason, virtually all of the glucosamine sulfate imported into the US is only 80% pure with the remaining 20% being sodium or potassium chloride (this accounts for the high percentage of ash found in the sulfate on ignition). In a dietary supplement market that is under constant government and media scrutiny, purity and stability are key elements for success.

There is also the additional question of economics. Because glucosamine sulfate is made from glucosamine hydrochloride, it is significantly more expensive - approximately 1.5 times the price of the hydrochloride. The presence of 20% by weight sodium (or potassium) chloride in order to avoid stability problems further dilutes the sulfate and significantly adds to the cost of the sulfate on an active glucosamine basis. Conversely, D-Glucosamine HCl provides a high purity, stable source of glucosamine that is readily absorbed by the body and is the most cost effective form of glucosamine available.

The NutraSense Company, in cooperation with Pfanstiehl Laboratories Inc. (the only US manufacturer), offers D-Glucosamine Hydrochloride to the pharmaceutical, health-nutrition, and animal health markets. Pfanstiehl operates an FDA approved, GMP plant that manufactures pharmaceutical grade D-Glucosamine Hydrochloride of the highest quality.

www.nutrasense.com 에서 발췌한 내용임.

요약하자면 염산염(hydrochloride)이나 황산염(sulfate) 둘다 소화되어 위장내에 들어가면 강력한 위산에의해 용해되어 흡수되기때문에 효능의 차이가 없으나. 순도면에서 염산염 글루코사민이 높고 안정성이 있는반면 황산염의 경우는 습기에 약하다는 평가임. 경제적인 면에서도 염산염이 저렴하다.